Quantcast

Mortgage Grapevine

Political: I was just listening to a Romney guy on FOX talk about absentee ballots---

He claimed Dems were under performing.

Let me tell you this. I live in a a solidly "purple state"

This past week I've been helping out counting absentee ballots in a fairly liberal, populous county within the state.

It's running about 10/1 Obama to Romney. That's clearly is not "under performing"

My ONLY point is that Obama is NOT under performing. ROmney is certainly not "over performing."

Just thought I'd add a bit of reality.


by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:34 AM


Just thought I'd add a bit of reality.

by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:34 AM

Now That's Funny. Reality from the resident biased useful idiot.


by ConservativeMe November 4, 2012 9:40 AM


They actually let you get your hands on the ballots?

That's Scary.


by splugy's ghost November 4, 2012 10:00 AM


"In sum, I see the bottom slipping out from under Obama’s feet, and a campaign hoping to hold on just long enough to salvage a slim victory, one where he is almost certain to lose the popular vote. He is underperforming among whites and independents, and particularly among those likeliest to vote. I have never believed in running the prevent defense, and Obama has been running it for months. Running out the clock is rarely a winning strategy in sports or politics, and it is one I expect to fail this year. Thus, my prediction for Tuesday is this : Obama 260, Romney 278."

Click Here
by Lex Parsimoniae November 4, 2012 10:01 AM


lex: They were specifically talking about absentee ballots.
I don't see Obama "under performing."
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 10:04 AM


wait, you're counting votes BEFORE election day???
by rspringer November 4, 2012 10:51 AM


aren't you in MN? absentee ballots in MN are counted AFTER polls close on election day.


by rspringer November 4, 2012 10:54 AM


He's far underperforming against his 08 numbers on absentee ballots. He lost to McCain on election day, it was early voting and absentee ballots that put him over.

On the other side of the coin, the republicans have come out in force both on early voting and absentee voting narrowing that gap.

And republicans tend to actually come out in mass on election day vs democrats.

More than likely the core dem's have now voted for the most part.

Like I've said, I can see Romney getting 285+ electoral votes as well as the popular vote.


by Lex Parsimoniae November 4, 2012 10:56 AM


"This past week I've been helping out counting absentee ballots in a fairly liberal, populous county within the state.

It's running about 10/1 Obama to Romney. That's clearly is not 'under performing'"
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:34 AM


"aren't you in MN? absentee ballots in MN are counted AFTER polls close on election day."
by rspringer November 4, 2012 10:54 AM


After four years of telling us that election fraud is a myth, here's TF admitting to it himself.


by The Truth November 4, 2012 11:56 AM


Thanks TF....we appreciate you bringing this to light before the election. Report made...


by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 12:16 PM


Thanks Trish. I thought the same thing.

I try to stay out of his posts because I have no political opinion of sorts that are educated enough to voice.


I have a definite opinion about either this blatant lie, or if true, his posting election results of any sort. I'm sure [or there should be] an oath of some sort and a non-disclosure statement signed.



Because I will forget to do it;

Please ANYONE and EVERYONE, post a link to this thread in every post he starts or responds to so all can know what/who they are dealing with. It wouldn't be stalking it would be an education as to veracity/character.
by turdly November 4, 2012 12:42 PM


I believe TGK knows Ancho's real name and location. He might be able to find out if this is real or total BS.

My guess though is Ancho was just blatantly lying. I shutter to think that he is actually allowed to count votes.


by rspringer November 4, 2012 12:50 PM


I hope you are right rspringer but it really needs to be investigated...
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 12:52 PM


It needs to be brought public every single post that he would either lie so blatantly as to think us stupid, or would actually do such.
by turdly November 4, 2012 1:07 PM


I'm guessing we won't be seeing Ancho for quite some time, turdly.


by rspringer November 4, 2012 1:09 PM


Here's a link to state by state absentee ballot counting guidelines.

Click Here



by rspringer November 4, 2012 1:20 PM


Here is the election board info for MN if that is where TF is from.

Click Here
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 1:29 PM


Thanks rspringer.
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 1:30 PM


aren't you in MN? absentee ballots in MN are counted AFTER polls close on election day.
by rspringer November 4, 2012 10:54 AM

Yeah, I shouldn't have used the word "counting"
My error.

Should have said "processing."
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 7:54 PM


Yeah, I shouldn't have used the word "counting"
My error.

Should have said "processing."
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 7:54 PM

How would you know the "count" if you were not counting them...nice try liar.
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 7:58 PM


"Processing" has such a nice meaningless ring to it, as opposed to the election fraud specifics of "counting" and "reporting results".


by The Truth November 4, 2012 8:04 PM


You're so full of crap Ancho. A) why would they need an outsider's help to 'process' absentee ballots? and B) as Trishy said, how do you know who these ballots were cast for?

Bottom line, you've been caught in a bold faced lie. Whatever credibility you had left has been extinguished.


by rspringer November 4, 2012 8:07 PM


How would Romney campaign operatives know Obama is under performing with absentee voters? Why isn't your hair on fire over their statements? They seem to know nationwide. Maybe you should investigate!

Don't be such a dipshit. I don't know the "count" nor do I care, so lighten up.


by That's funny! November 4, 2012 8:12 PM


And no, it's no Minnesota. Isn't Minnesota blue?

Click Here
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 8:15 PM


TF you are a pathetic liar and fraud. You had little credibility before...you have none now.
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 8:18 PM


you're a liar, ancho. You've been caught. Move on with your life. I'm actually reaching the point of being sad for you.
by rspringer November 4, 2012 8:28 PM


"How would Romney campaign operatives know Obama is under performing with absentee voters?"
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 8:12 PM

They're looking at polling data. They're not peeking in the ballots like you.


"Don't be such a dipshit. I don't know the "count" nor do I care, so lighten up."
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 8:12 PM

You "don't care" about the count? So you're just peeking the ballots for fun? So you can post this:

"It's running about 10/1 Obama to Romney... My ONLY point is that Obama is NOT under performing."

...as a public service?


Time to go with one of your other screen names, buddy.



by The Truth November 4, 2012 8:41 PM


What did I lie about?
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 8:50 PM


And why aren't you questioning Romney operatives?

You guys really are a hoot!
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 8:51 PM


Read your post and you tell us which part is a lie.

Choose carefully.
by rspringer November 4, 2012 8:52 PM


No You tell me where I lied.
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:01 PM


Romney operatives claim to have more detailed information than i have. Are they lying?
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:02 PM


Your claim has been passed on to election officials, they can decide if you are just a liar or if you are committing voter fraud.


by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 9:03 PM


Voter fraud?

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!

Goddamn you are a bunch of imbeciles!

I'm done with this. You really are too stupid for words.

But here is some advice. Before you go around accusing people of voter fraud you better damn well have the facts at hand.

Also, do yourselves a favor. Get involved in the process so you understand just what the hell happens "behind the scenes" in your area so you can speak with some knowledge about the voting process.

It's comical. Everything you don't understand is either "fraud" or turned into some kind of conspiracy theory.

"You people" are really idiots. Oh, and let me know what the officials say when you "pass along" the information about the Romney hacks.
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:14 PM


Click Here

"Chieffalo expects to have as many as four two-worker teams processing absentee ballots on Election Day, while past years have seen just one or two teams doing the work. Each team is comprised of one Democrat and one Republican.

One team member reads off the markings on the absentee ballot, while the second enters the choices into the touchscreen voting machine. Chieffalo said they will start the task about 2 p.m. Tuesday, and she expects the work will take at least five hours."

Now imagine a larger metropolitan area/city with 20,000 + absentee ballots. How would morons like you think a project like that gets done?


by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:21 PM


Key words: on Election Day.

You also claimed to have a 10/1 vote count edge for Obama. You lied. Because you are a liar. It's what you do.
by rspringer November 4, 2012 9:26 PM


Click Here

The process is handled by a panel of four judges, 2 Republicans and 2 Democrats. During a normal election, the process doesn't start until early evening but due to the number of absentees being filed, the process will get underway earlier this year.
The ballots will remain at the Camden County Courthouse for counting. The process starts with sorting the ballots, checking for proper signatures and making certain all absentee ballots are notarized. Once the ballots are sorted, the counting will begin. Absentee votes are always the first ballots counted. With the number of ballots to be handled this year, the clerk's office is hoping to have the results.
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:32 PM


"Key words: on Election Day."

Absentee ballots are PROCESSED in larger counties and municipalities WELL IN ADVANCE of election day. It's physcially IMPOSSIBLE to sort thru and process absentee ballots that number in the 10's of thousands. Not everyone lives in some backwater Mayberry setting that has 12 absentee ballots to process.

Use your fucking head! Think!

Do your fucking homework. Better yet, get active in your area so you know what the hell you are talking about.


by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:44 PM


I thought you said you were "done with this."

That's another lie, isn't it?

In addition to admitting to election fraud: counting ballots before election day and reporting results.

What are you trying to do - suppress the Republican vote?

You're a real hoot!

by The Truth November 4, 2012 10:07 PM


i volunteer in a precinct in one of the five biggest cities in America.

we don't open any ballots or "process" anything until election day. the ballots go into sealed containers. if by "process" you mean take it out of the bucket from the post office and put it into a ballot box without looking at it then maybe you would be right. but you didn't say that, did you? you said you were counting and you gave us a running count.

my state, which is solid blue, has 28 days after election day to count the absentees. we're expecting record numbers so the supervisor has staffed up.

i guess you don't know much about how the process works. when you have a big city, you have lots of precincts. precincts are set by the number of voters. more voters, more precincts. it's pretty simple, unless you're an idiot.

which i guess you are. or a liar.

by Contrarian November 4, 2012 10:18 PM


"Absentee ballots are PROCESSED in larger counties and municipalities WELL IN ADVANCE of election day."
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 9:44 PM


Well, well, well. It seems you're either lying or you can't read.

Here's the part you left out of the article you cited:

"According to the Camden County clerk's office, the process for handling the more than 3,000 absentee ballots cast for the 2012 presidential election will get underway at 6 a.m. Tuesday morning."
Click Here


Just so you know, that's the sentence that ends right where your quote begins.


Lord Almighty but I do love it so when I feed you crow - feathers and all.


Seems like YOU are the one who hasn't done his "f-ing homework."

Idiot.

by The Truth November 4, 2012 10:26 PM


Define 'processed' ancho. Votes are not counted until the polls are closed per MN guidelines. What exactly are you doing? Besides lying repeatedly.
by rspringer November 4, 2012 10:28 PM


Anchofunny, just to dumb it down enough for you to comprehend, by "early start", the elections folks mean EARLY IN THE MORNING ON ELECTION DAY. Like 6:00 am.


Idiot.

by The Truth November 4, 2012 10:29 PM


said you were counting and you gave us a running count.

Yes, I misstated and said "counting" I said that was an error. You want to keep pounding away at that, go ahead. We were PROCESSING ballots.

However I did not give you a running count.

Bu t nice try.

"you mean take it out of the bucket from the post office and put it into a ballot box without looking at it then maybe you would be right."

Maybe you process absentee ballots at the polling location. Then you would be correct.

by That's funny! November 4, 2012 10:47 PM


It's running about 10/1 Obama to Romney...

Not a running count eh?


You are caught in a lie or fraud...u choose.
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 10:53 PM


Define 'processed' ancho. Votes are not counted until the polls are closed per MN guidelines. What exactly are you doing? Besides lying repeatedly.
by rspringer November 4, 2012 10:28 PM

First of all its not Minnesota. Second of all this seems to be way over your head. But to simplify, ballots are taken out of the sealed envelopes, separated into several categories and each category is counted(NOT TABULATED). This includes Federal ballots. It's a centralized process rather than done in each precinct.
Now, when I say "counted" I mean the raw number of ballots per ward/precinct. Do you nderstand that?

Please, keep pounding away. You know absolutely nothing about the process. I tried to link to some articles to give you and idea----Dem/Rep have to be present etc.

But again, keep pounding away. Show yourself to be the dipshit you really are.

This is hysterical. The FOX hounds come out of the woodwork to take exception to something they know nothing about.

And it's like when Obama said he went to "57 states". You just couldn't get over that one.
"That's what he said. Why did he say it if actually knows how many states there are? Obviously he is lying or he doesn't know how many states there are"

Idiots.
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 10:59 PM


You are caught in a lie or fraud...u choose.
by trishy1010 November 4, 2012 10:53 PM

"About" is not a "running count/"

You are either a half wit or a moron, you choose.

Waht did the Romney folks say when you addressed this issue with them? THey seem to know that Obama is under performing.
Did you ask them how they knew that?


They certainly wouldn't lie to you would they?
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 11:38 PM


Dance, monkey, dance!


You say you're counting ballots, then you're "processing" them.

You say Obama is running 10 to 1, but then you say you're not counting them.

You say that "Absentee ballots are PROCESSED in larger counties and municipalities WELL IN ADVANCE of election day", but the article you quote to back you up says that ballots are not processed until Election Day.

You are telling lie after lie after lie to get out of the ballot tampering you admitted...

...and you call US the morons.

That's Funny!


by The Truth November 5, 2012 12:21 AM


"Now, when I say "counted" I mean the raw number of ballots per ward/precinct. Do you nderstand that?"
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 10:59 PM


But somehow you told us that you are counting 10 Obama ballots for every Romney ballot.

Is that a lie, or are you peeking?


"I tried to link to some articles to give you and idea----Dem/Rep have to be present etc"
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 10:59 PM


I read your link. It said you're lying.

by The Truth November 5, 2012 12:24 AM


Caught. Stone cold caught.

Now all he can do is flop like a fish. But each flop only sets the hook deeper.

He should of just shut his mouth. But instead he posted again with an artcile that tightened the noose even further.

Its funny, but memory tells me that he was one of the ones railing on Scooter Libby back in the day... crowing that it is not the initial crime that gets you, it is the cover up. I'll have to go back and check the threads.

My congratulations to Rspringer for catching that one.
by divot November 5, 2012 2:21 AM


TF,
You built that lie!
by dead eye November 5, 2012 5:13 AM


TF,
You built that lie!
by dead eye November 5, 2012 5:13 AM

I'm Barry Soetoro and I approve that lie.
by ConservativeMe November 5, 2012 7:32 AM


Waht did the Romney folks say when you addressed this issue with them? THey seem to know that Obama is under performing.
Did you ask them how they knew that?


They certainly wouldn't lie to you would they?
by That's funny! November 4, 2012 11:38 PM

That's Semantics, the Romney folks are saying Obama is underperforming based on the number of democrats that either voted absentee or early.

That's been clear all along.

No need to ask.

They didn't claim to be counting votes prior to election day, or even "processing" (you gotta love euphemisms).
by Lex Parsimoniae November 5, 2012 8:43 AM


Ancho has some Biden rubbing off on him , monkey says monkey do:'There's never been a day in the last four years I've been proud to be his VP,' as he talks about Obama's record as president.
by The Jester Is A Mirror November 5, 2012 9:05 AM


"s that a lie, or are you peeking?"

Seriously. Go get involved in the process youselves so you can understand HOW the electoral process works in your area.

Think real gooooooooood. DO you think it's important to COUNT the number of absentee ballots that arrive in a particular municipality? If you are tabulating the ballots at a local precinct how do you think they would get there? Does the clerk just grab a pile and send them out to the precints willy nilly? How abut unregistered voters? How about ballots from overseas? What do you do with absentees that have federal ballots? How do those at the precint level know a voter hasn't already voted absentee? DO they guess?
Or do you think they just throw everything in a box and and wait until election day to do anything with them?

I love this thread. It shows just how uninformed you guys are. And this is like every other issue you people don't understand.
If it doesn't make sense. Or if you don't like the way something is worded or sounds you go ape shit and start claiming conspiracy or fraud.

Take any issue the last 4 years. You understnad almost nothing about them (Holder's "gun running" for example) yet you cry and bitch and protest.

You are idiots. But nobody can convince you of that because frauds like Hannity, Breitbart and Limbaugh make a living by reinforcing your ignorance and telling you that you are right.

Lex, regarding ABSENTEE VOTING: They wouldn't know how many Democrats(or Republicans) voted unless they saw the ballots or somebody told them. They could possibly know how many in aggregate but not the breakdown. Are they lying then about Obama under performing? Did they commit fraud?


by That's funny! November 5, 2012 9:22 AM


And what is utterly laughable (and instructive) is not one of you has called Romney on any of his bullshit. Not ONCE!

You claim I lie when I'm not and then you give Romney a pass on literally everything.

"Obama made the economy worse"

hahahahahahahahahahaha!

Idiots AND hypocrites!
by That's funny! November 5, 2012 9:39 AM


"Or if you don't like the way something is worded or sounds you go ape shit"

That is a heck of a thing for you to complain about Ancho. You have crucified so many for the slightest statements. Twisting things into "rascism" or "war on women" or "war on the environment" or whatever other democrat talking point might be needed at the time.

If there is anyone that has "gone ape shit" over the way insignificant statements by your opponents are worded or sound it is you.

That is you calling card.

Yet you will swallow whole any pile of crap logic that the liberal democrat spin meisters direct you to.

Pathetic. You bleat like a sheep when you are caught.
by divot November 5, 2012 9:45 AM


You know, TF, you keep harping that you are the one who "knows the process", yet you been shown that every one of your statements is false.

Even the links you cited prove you're lying.

You're like that nut in New York who tweeted fake news reports that embarrassed the media that reported them and panicked people. Like him, you've drawn a poopstorm down upon your head.

You're so desperate to draw any kind of prediction out of a dead heat election that you've resorted to just making things up.

It's pathetic.


by The Truth November 5, 2012 9:47 AM


Let's not forget that 16 minutes after the news of the shooting of Congresswoman Giffords, TF blamed the Tea Party. TF argued for days that campaign rhetoric was to blame and kept that falsehood going in the face of mounting evidence that the killer was a random lunatic.

This has to be one of TF's most entertaining moments of idiocy.


"Caught. Stone cold caught.

Now all he can do is flop like a fish. But each flop only sets the hook deeper."
by divot November 5, 2012 2:21 AM


The classic That's Funny! defense:
"Never mind what I posted! You're ignorant! You're racist! Romney this and Republicans that!"

I'm LMAO x 10.

by The Truth November 5, 2012 9:52 AM


All we have to do is to remember to link his every word heretofore to this thread.

Click Here
by turdly November 5, 2012 10:36 AM


Ancho failed in Minnesota. He couldn't cut it in our business here, and went running to where many failures go to. DC. He lives in a state in the DC area, close enough to get to the free donuts at work everyday.

I'm sure today his handlers are telling him. "See this is why we assign you to Mortgage site that not that many people go to".

He obviously isn't smart enough to know that polsteres have figured out how to poll people that vote early.

He'll be driving a bus and handing out packs of smokes tomorrow.




by YATI November 5, 2012 10:39 AM


Yati,

Wow. I would have to say that is a great summary of the Anchostooge.

Can't wait for his Wednesday meltdown after his leftist wet dream comes crashing down.

Guess the layoffs will be coming there at spin central after the funding gets cut. He'll back at Starbucks full time and posting from the free WiFi on his breaks. Now That's Funny.
by ConservativeMe November 5, 2012 11:54 AM


This has been better that "To Catch a Predator." I'm just sayin'...thanks, springer.

--bats
by ragingbats November 5, 2012 12:50 PM


OMG, Ancho drives?!
On Streets?!?
With People?!?!?
by Lex Parsimoniae November 5, 2012 1:34 PM


This is a thread for the ages.

Clueless wingnuts that know absolutely nothing about the eloectoral process are calling me a liar. Idiots, that up until I schooled them, didn't know the difference between voter fraud and election fraud. Some of you still haven't been able to get your heads around the differnce.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha!

Keep it coming! This is pure wing tard gold!


by That's funny! November 5, 2012 2:27 PM


Anchochimp,

While you are schooling us could you explain "the eloectoral process" for us?

Can tell you are completely flustered and rushing because your break there at Starbucks is almost over. You're a useful idiot but you generally mange to use spell check.

Can't wait for your head to explode on Wednesday when your leftist wet dream comes to an end.

by ConservativeMe November 5, 2012 2:49 PM


Ancho,

And still no comment about your being a failure in the mortgage industry?

What a little girl....My apologies to little girls, I know you have more back bone than Ancho.
by YATI November 5, 2012 2:59 PM


Ancho,

And still no comment about your being a failure in the mortgage industry?

What a little girl....My apologies to little girls, I know you have more back bone than Ancho.
by YATI November 5, 2012 2:59 PM

Yati,

What comment can there be? Maybe he can blame Bush for his failings.

by ConservativeMe November 5, 2012 3:23 PM


Ancho, yes you have shown us what a fraud is!
by dead eye November 5, 2012 3:36 PM


"diots, that up until I schooled them"

And now he's lying to himself.
by Lex Parsimoniae November 5, 2012 4:08 PM


Anchofunny, you really are the prize arse of the day.

It's so apparent why you started this thread. You were sitting in your basement, listening to Fox News, and some commentator offered an analysis that among absentee ballots, Obama was under-performing compared to 2008.

You went nuts. Just plain nuts. You couldn't handle the truth.

So you made up some cockamamie story that you were an election volunteer as a basis for claiming that Obama was actually outperforming Romney by 10 votes to 1.

The problem is your complete ignorance about the election process. Your claims were so outlandish, so patently impossible, that you got caught.

The funny part is that your claims amounted to tampering with ballots.


Now there was a completely different way to handle this. You could have acted like a sane individual... someone like Concerned American, who posted a news link that reported that among absentee ballots, more were being returned by Democrat registered voters than by Republican registered voters.

CA didn't try to make up a bunch of bullcrap to make himself look like he had secret information. He simply posted the link, added his comments about the gross number of absentee ballots returned, and rubbed it in a little. All fine and good.

Click Here

Of course the same article reported that Obama was under performing and Romney was over performing compared to McCain. This wasn't a statement by mysterious Romney "operatives", as you allege, but was based on data released by a few states and analyzed by the Associated Press and the United States Election Project.

Bottom line, CA trumpeted some of the data as being good for Obama, while some of us Righties trumpeted data that looked good for Romney.


See how adults play? We post news articles - not blogs and bullcrap - and we don't make stuff up.


Now you've dug yourself such a whole over this threadbare lie that you've had to tell lie after lie to keep from admitting the truth.

It's pathetic.

And somehow in your twisted mind, the fact that everybody else knows the election laws better than you, that everybody else had to school you, and that everybody else knows once again that you're a fraud - well, that gives you a reason to call us the idiots.


Idiot.

by The Truth November 5, 2012 5:51 PM


This is a thread for the ages.
by That's funny! November 5, 2012 2:27 PM


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes it is. And if I have any faith at all in the posters here, it will be attached to every single thread you ever start or respond to.


For the ages is a very correct analogy.

You might want to change your name again so at least we'll have to footnote the insertion.
by turdly November 5, 2012 6:27 PM


So you made up some cockamamie story that you were an election volunteer as a basis for claiming that Obama was actually outperforming Romney by 10 votes to 1.
The problem is your complete ignorance about the election process. Your claims were so outlandish, so patently impossible, that you got caught.
The funny part is that your claims amounted to tampering with ballots. Truth

Honest to god. You just don't stop with the stupidity!
I've been involved in the "election process" for well over a decade. How long have you been involved? Can you describe, in detail, how absentee ballots are accepted, counted and tabulated in your community? Can any of you idiots?


This is why they can get away with Voter ID laws. You and your cohorts are literally clueless.
They depend on your stupidity.

by That's funny! November 5, 2012 7:12 PM


I've been involved in the "election process" for well over a decade. How long have you been involved?

about 50 years!

As usual you don't know what you are taling about!


by dead eye November 5, 2012 7:29 PM


Anchochimp involved in the election process for 10 years.

Sounds like a lot of fraud to me. That could explain how we got Al Franken.




by ConservativeMe November 5, 2012 7:42 PM


"I've been involved in the "election process" for well over a decade."
by That's funny! November 5, 2012 7:12 PM


"I've been eligible to vote for ten years now."
by Grapevine Translator November 5, 2012 8:26 PM


"How long have you been involved? Can you describe, in detail, how absentee ballots are accepted, counted and tabulated in your community? Can any of you idiots?"
by That's funny! November 5, 2012 7:12 PM


"I'm desperate here, so I'll just resort to insults"
by That's funny! November 5, 2012 7:12 PM
by Grapevine Translator November 5, 2012 8:27 PM


Reply

Username:
Password:
(No password? Register here)
Message:
(Don't be a nuisance.  Please avoid offensive language.  Advertisements are not allowed.)


Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.